Why The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong

by K. B. Robertson

The Big Bang Universe 'has a (speculatively presumed'super split second') beginning' and a speculatively presumed (entropic 'heat death') 'ending'. Unlike the Steady State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which (Steady State Theory) was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven expansion of the spatial universe 'must result; "inevitably" in the dissipation of occurrent numbers (density) of objects occupying given units of space over extensively progressive periods of time.' A Steady State Theory projects a general uniform density of space, rather than a dissipating space projected in a *Big Bang translation of Universal History. From the more dense - relatively smaller - past; into the increasingly less dense and ever-enlarging future.

Space always becoming more dissipated with increased passage of time in the spatially expanding, Big Bang. Which is what is said to 'inevitably' result when the dissipating universe of the present and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) past. Eventually 'intersecting' very densely, when and where an explosion (*Big Bang) is said to have occurred. Proclaimed by the big bang gang (not to mention NASA) to be the cause of the recently discovered, spatially expanding universe' - *therefore 'thinning out' with the passage of time.

Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a desperately concocted (1927 emerged, Henry Silpher discovered, Edwin Hubble refined, Lemaitre generalized), ad hocly makeshift history. The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in response to the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is expanding (1927-'34). Back-tracking the observed expansion through past time seems to find the observed expanding universe at a point of convergence - an intersecting point where all the matter of the universe was presumably joined in one singular 'cosmic egg'. What seems 'inevitably', to be ('therefore') a universal 'beginning'.

Yet, there is, in astrophysically proven and agreed upon fact: no common center from which the spatially expanding universe recedes. The expansion is proven, dynamically structured as though the center (alleged origin of the 'big bang' - said to be the beginning cause of the observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the location of any given observation point: the structural dynamics of the observed expanding universe are such that always the 'red-shift' recession of the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects) is: in direct line of sight; moving directly away from points of observation; wherever they are located... Establishing a structural expansion corroborating a physically and spatially expanding - steady state - universe.

Where 'the center' is ('would be') everywhere; as it is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of mass ('charge'/'disturbance'; systems of combined particles) and its (their) generation of omnidirectionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity as the collective cause - and 'origin' of the observed, red-shift measured expanding universe. The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past's intersection of three dimensions to a 'point of origin' (the anticipated 'end' of retroactively expanding space - traced backwards in time to 'an inevitable intersection' and consequent point of 'beginning'), does not apply to a four dimensional space-time continuum. The past of which is progressively smaller, to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially expanding ('Big Bang originated'; 3-Dimensionally fixated) universe is traced backwards through past time from the present.

Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is popularly said by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an intersection where 'space ends': in three dimensions. There is no open argument against the omniscience of the four dimensional space time continuum here. It is simply and altogether excluded as a solution (refer 'option'/ AKA, ultimatum). The Big Bang Theory denies altogether here, what its perpetrators say they acknowledge...Meanwhile. The Big Bang Theory instantly goes extinct, when it comes in contact with the (Invisible, 'What? ') four dimensional space-time continuum. Whereas, in four dimensions (when space-time is not excluded from the universe, as the Big Bang Theory excludes the 4th dimension altogether), past space goes on ever-smaller forever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as largeness: with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located everywhere in the occurrence of matter-field 'particles' (without a spatial limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter, culminating in the alleged explosive 'beginning'); in the increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever larger forever in the increasingly distant future; to infinity.

Although black holes have yet to be proven, they are nonetheless extremely controversial and have strangely taken the foreground of discussions in theoretical physics. Their cause - if they exist at all - is not controversial. Presently, with the exception of this offering, there are not even any formally submitted guesses as to their cause. If black holes exist, until further notice, they are - ostensibly - the causative result of a contracting four dimensional space-time continuum; that is to say, a four dimensionally contracting material system, becoming ever smaller and more dense:to microcosmic infinity.

The four dimensionally expanding steady state universe(universal density) remains always the same relative density; consisting always of the same amount of energy, increasingly distributed over - creatively becoming - an ever enlarging space; from microcosmic infinity, to macrocosmic infinity. Without infringement on the law of conservation of Mass-Energy 4-D smallness (of past space-time) as infinite as 4-D largeness of future. With the present eternally in the middle of micro-cosmic past-smallness and macrocosmic future largeness. Whereas, the 3-D pie chart intersects 'end-space' where all of it's ever narrowing slices come together at the center. A weightless apple pie, without gravity.

The four, five and six dimensional universe demonstrates and reinstates a (Bondi-Hoyle represented, 1948 introduced, then abandoned), Steady State universe; without beginning or end. The same amount of ever-expanding energy distributing itself over in-creasing amounts of space - all densities per coordinately systematized frame of reference remaining relatively stable and 'unmoving', 'static', 'not expanding': relative to all other comparably expanding material in a given coordinate system - to infinity. 'Disturbed areas', 'spreading indefinitely.' Generating 4-D space-time.

Credits to K. B. Robertson

Gravity 4-D Index


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS level 3!